I hope some of these suggestions help to get you started. San Francisco Edit, Using first person can help emphasize a point or illustrate a contrasting finding.
Begin with a restatement of your research question, followed by a statement about whether or not, and how much, your findings "answer" the question.
This would demonstrate to the reader that you have inadequately examined and interpreted the data. Systematically explain the underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant. However, if your findings raise a lot of new questions or issues, consider including suggestions for further research in the discussion section.
With a little manipulation these paragraph headings become topic sentences for each paragraph.
While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field. What parts would it need. Knowledge claims are like dumplings in the thesis soup or chocolate chips in the PhD cookie.
Another useful suggestion from Howard Becker is the null hypothesis technique; write down why the results mean nothing.
If you are feeling anxious about the discussion section rest assured you are not alone. Wendy sat in a chair and just talked at me. Alternatively write them in an email to someone. It explains your findings and interprets them in context of previous work, as well as provides some suggestions for future research.
What would it look like. Your discussion section allows you to take a fresh perspective on your findings, so you can dig deep and provide new and original ideas from your research. Nature Neuroscience, 13,DOI: Importance of a Good Discussion The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: Furthermore, imaging dozens of neurons simultaneously allowed us to unravel temporal interactions between thousands of neuronal pairs as measured by noise correlations.
Explain the limitations of the work: The snowflake method is a technique used by novel writers. Although our data seems to best fit the overlapping subnetworks model, it is only one interpretation of our results. Pretend your results are produced by a machine then describe the machine.
How would the machine work. If you decide to combine these two concepts, it is important that you cover all of your required topics in a systematic way. Avoid using an apologetic tone; however, be honest and self-critical [e. Specifically, at short distances we observed both very large and very small correlations, while at longer distances we observed only smaller correlations.
The discussion section is a very important part of your dissertation or research paper. It is also one of the most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest.
Yet, many students write. Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research paper.
There are elements of the discussion that should be included and other things that should be avoided. Always write the discussion for the reader; remember that the focus should be. When writing a dissertation or thesis, the results and discussion sections can be both the most interesting as well as the most challenging sections to write.
You may choose to write these sections separately, or combine them into a single chapter, depending on your university’s guidelines and your own preferences.
Writing a discussion section is where you really begin to add your interpretations to the work. In stead of writing one discussion chapter, each chapter in which I present my results or approach contains a discussion. This had the advantage that when writing the chapter, you are better able to consider the differences with other findings and you have the best knowledge of your own findings.
The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis.
The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Not everyone writes a chapter called "discussion", but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well - that's where the creative magic of the PhD happens. The discussion section is scary because you have to.Writing a discussion section of thesis definition